The reviews of Angela’s
Ashes each paint the title as an incredibly moving and worthwhile
memoir. It was a widespread
popular success, and received many favorable reviews from informal sites, like
Amazon, as well as these reviews from more scholarly sources. Given these two factors, I would
certainly add this title to a public library collection. As professional reviewers from
reputable sources believe the book to be of high literary quality, and the hype
that accompanied its release, I believe many library customers would be
interested in Angela’s Ashes.
On the other hand, the presentation of The Chosen One was less clear-cut. While the blog review only provides a plot summary, it does
give the reader an idea of what they’re buying. However, none of the other guidelines from the presentation
are followed, as there are no quotations and no critical analysis. This may be due to the fact that the
review is posted on her own site, as many of the other reviews on the site are
of higher quality, such as this
one.
The Amazon review provides a bit more detail, but is out of
place in that setting. The
reviewer’s academic tone is unusual for an Amazon review, and does include many
of the components of a successful review, but is unlikely to be effective. If a review is meant to be published in
an academic venue, then this tone would be appropriate, but if the review is
published in a venue that is aimed more toward the everyman, a less
sophisticated tone would be more appropriate. The book reviews that you see published in People or Entertainment Weekly are much less formal than those published in Library Journal. The need to write for your audience is something that a
reviewer should keep in mind. As
it stands, the Amazon review from Dr. Rosemarin does not seem overly reliable,
especially given that according to his own blog, he is also an aspiring
novelist. It is likely that his
review is biased, and other Amazon reviews might be more helpful in determining
if this book is worthwhile for a library collection.
I think that library collections, as much as we don’t like
to admit it, follow the trends set out by the publishing industry. If a publisher heavily promotes a book,
including lobbying for good or prominent reviews, then that book will likely be
in demand at libraries. Perhaps
libraries do have a bit more freedom in selecting materials, but the fact remains
that without marking materials in some way, it’s not likely that they will see
much use, and will eventually be weeded.
I know that there are many excellent books out there that don’t get
their fair shot, simply because no one knew to read them. Likewise, I believe that it’s unfair to
limit reviews to only those that are favorable – it leads readers toward
materials that might not be worth their while. Choosing to only publish favorable reviews is on par with
publishing a biased review; if you’re not equally willing to present both the
good and the bad, the review is of little use.
I’m only in charge of purchasing materials for my small
church library, and since we unfortunately don’t have a budget at all (even for
tape – I have to bring it from home), I tend to avoid looking at reviews
because it just makes me frustrated that I can’t purchase them. I do have publisher’s websites and
Christian book retailers bookmarked on my computer, but I rarely have the guts
to visit and see what our library is missing out on.
Personally, I rarely use professional reviews in making
selections for reading. I usually
utilize reviews from Amazon, Barnes & Noble, or Goodreads to make
selections. I frequently have
several browser windows open when selecting books from my library: one with the
library catalog, and a couple other aforementioned sites that offer more
in-depth reviews. If the library
catalog had the ability to integrate those reviews, or even better,
professional reviews from reputable sources, it would be much easier to browse
the catalog.
I acknowledge that it makes me a bit weird, but I actually
enjoy reviews that give away the ending a bit (so long as they’re marked with a
spoiler alert). I’m that
exasperating reader that reads the last few pages if I can’t quite see how the
book will turn out, and usually that gives me the motivation to finish it. Same goes with reviews; if there is no
mystery element to the novel, I like to know where it’s going before I commit
to reading it. Most recently, I confess I did this with Allegiant by Veronica Roth. I'd heard so many mixed reviews about the way the novel ended, I needed to know what I was getting into (which, incidentally, was exactly what I expected). There are so many
wonderful books out there, I don’t want to waste time on a dud!
I think the main purpose of the review is to see if it's worth the time to read the book for patrons and buying power for librarians. I agree with your thoughts on weeding and budget as part of selection; these real life issues exist.
ReplyDeleteI am so glad that I did not read the ending of Allegiant first. If I had, I would have missed out on two great books. Yes, I will admit, that the third book ruined the whole series for me but I am glad that I read them. The first two were so good!! I feel like I grew along with Tris. That is one reason that I do not want to read reviews for my personal use. I do not want someone else to bias me to a book before I have a chance to make my own impression. Moving away from that tangent, I do agree that it is sad that so many good books get weeded because they just were not marketed as much as others. We are in the process of weeding at my branch and I always question whether it is a good idea to use circulation stats for weeding.
ReplyDeleteI also hate to use circulation statistics as the primary basis for weeding because that means that many good books are eventually weeded out. However, if a library is proactive about letting their patrons know what's new in the collection, then if it's never checked out, they can assume it's truly because no one found it interesting. This is one of the things that my home library does that I love; they publish a weekly list of items just ordered and items just in, as well as most popular items, and they do this in a dozen categories. When I've talked with staff members, they have stated that a huge proportion of library circulation occurs off of these lists, and they're automatically generated, so it's not even labor intensive. Given that, if something is never checked out, then, in their thinking, it wasn't a great purchase in the first place, and they're okay with weeding it out.
DeleteHere's the link if you want to check it out!
http://www.naperville-lib.org/node/2122
And after further introspection, I've realized that I only skip to the end of a novel to see if I'm going to like the ending if I feel the plot is dragging. That's what happened with Allegiant; while the first two books in the series had constant action, this final one slowed down quite a bit in the middle to provide huge amounts of exposition.
DeleteI also did this with the book I Adventure book I read this week for my annotation, Labyrinth. It's divided into three parts, and part two was basically one big history lesson that didn't really pay off until the final two scenes. Once I knew where the book was going, and that eventually the time investment would be worth it, it was easier to make it to the end.
Like I said, I know it makes me weird, but somehow knowing the ending doesn't spoil the experience for me.